Can revocations be represented?

Model ownership and licensing as a verifiable rights chain

Attestik provides auditable rights attestations, distribution grants, and revocation-aware validation paths for media operations.

Rights records are split across contracts, systems, and regional policy teams.

License scope narrowing is hard to verify in downstream syndication chains.

Disputes often lack machine-verifiable evidence lineage.

Unauthorized distribution in unlicensed territories or windows.

Revenue leakage due to unverifiable entitlement transitions.

Legal escalation costs from weak provenance records.

Deterministic rights lineage from source holder through distribution.

Constraint-safe delegation with territory/time narrowing.

Faster dispute response with immutable proof artifacts.

Define rights holder, licensor, and distribution actors with signed identifiers.

Validate scope narrowing and authority consistency at each attestation handoff.

Publish chain roots and proof references into platform operations.

Capture ownership, grants, distribution constraints, and revocation references.

Use compact roots in runtime frames while preserving full chain retrievability.

Support legal and partner workflows with verification-ready evidence outputs.

SIP rights model explicitly defines constraint narrowing and authority consistency checks.

No. SIP can ingest and attest existing rights outcomes while improving verification quality.

Yes. Rights-chain updates can include revocation references and downstream invalidation logic.

Talk to the Attestik team, then route implementation into platform.framebright.ai when you are ready.