Is this only for playback?

Attach viewer authorization context to every decision point

Use signed authorization signals so playback, moderation, and policy engines evaluate entitlement with shared context.

Authorization logic is fragmented between application code, policy engines, and edge systems.

Viewer entitlement evaluations are often hard to audit retrospectively.

Regional and age-policy variants create complex failure modes.

Incorrect access grants during high-load or fallback behavior.

Overblocking due to ambiguous authorization state.

Weak explainability for denied access or safety escalations.

Signed, consistent authorization state across systems.

Policy evaluation inputs that can be audited and replayed.

Clear boundary handling for age, region, and entitlement changes.

Attach signed viewer authorization primitives to the verification flow.

Combine entitlement state with rights-chain and moderation outputs.

Emit explainable allow/deny events with evidence references.

Model eligibility, policy scope, and temporal validity in signed structures.

Apply the same decision logic across players, gateways, and backend services.

Reconstruct authorization decisions with deterministic evidence trails.

SIP specification separates viewer authorization as an independent attestation concern.

Yes. SIP authorization context can be mapped from existing identity and entitlement systems.

No. The same authorization context can inform moderation, policy, and analytics workflows.

Talk to the Attestik team, then route implementation into platform.framebright.ai when you are ready.